翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ "O" Is for Outlaw
・ "O"-Jung.Ban.Hap.
・ "Ode-to-Napoleon" hexachord
・ "Oh Yeah!" Live
・ "Our Contemporary" regional art exhibition (Leningrad, 1975)
・ "P" Is for Peril
・ "Pimpernel" Smith
・ "Polish death camp" controversy
・ "Pro knigi" ("About books")
・ "Prosopa" Greek Television Awards
・ "Pussy Cats" Starring the Walkmen
・ "Q" Is for Quarry
・ "R" Is for Ricochet
・ "R" The King (2016 film)
・ "Rags" Ragland
・ ! (album)
・ ! (disambiguation)
・ !!
・ !!!
・ !!! (album)
・ !!Destroy-Oh-Boy!!
・ !Action Pact!
・ !Arriba! La Pachanga
・ !Hero
・ !Hero (album)
・ !Kung language
・ !Oka Tokat
・ !PAUS3
・ !T.O.O.H.!
・ !Women Art Revolution


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enters. : ウィキペディア英語版
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises

''Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises'', 471 U.S. 539 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court decision which determined fair use is not a defense to the appropriation of work by a famous political figure because of the public interest in learning of that political figure's account of a historic event.
==Facts==
Former President Gerald Ford had written a memoir, ''A Time to Heal (memoir)'', including an account of his decision to pardon Richard Nixon. Ford had licensed his publication rights to Harper & Row, which had contracted for excerpts of the memoir to be printed in ''Time''. Instead, ''The Nation'' magazine published 300 to 400 words of verbatim quotes from the 500-page book without the permission of Ford, Harper & Row, or ''Time'' magazine. Based on this prior publication, ''Time'' withdrew from the contract (as it was permitted to by a clause therein), and Harper & Row filed a lawsuit against ''The Nation'' for copyright infringement. ''The Nation'' asserted as a defense that Ford was a public figure, and his reasons for pardoning Nixon were of vital interest, and that appropriation in such circumstances should qualify as a fair use.
A Federal trial judge ruled in favor of Harper & Row and awarded damages. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the ruling, finding that ''The Nations actions in quoting the memoirs were protected by fair use privilege. Harper & Row appealed this ruling to the Supreme Court.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.